For complex topics that regular users would not be interested in. For power users and database administrators.
-
packets
- Posts: 47
- Joined: Sat Jun 18, 2011 12:27 am
- Location: Holly Springs, NC
-
Contact:
Post
by packets » Sat Jul 23, 2011 3:12 pm
"The Magic of Big Data: GE, MIT Unveil New Way of Visualizing Disease"
http://preview.tinyurl.com/3ug9n9v
Anonymized records? Right... Imagine as "they" do, having access to BILLIONS of health records (including dental) across the US, and the trials they could mandate and/or service(s) deny. We’re just beginning to understand the true push for national healthcare and the state's desperate want of such data. The care provider’s budget or patient health cost clearly is of no concern. They (the state) want access to all those doctor's patient notes which are invisible to them today!
And you thought the muscle of Google or Facebook was scary...this is exponentially more threatening.
Last edited by
packets on Sat Sep 10, 2011 11:11 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
jordansparks
- Site Admin
- Posts: 5770
- Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2007 3:59 pm
- Location: Salem, Oregon
-
Contact:
Post
by jordansparks » Sat Jul 23, 2011 3:35 pm
I moved this here from the main forum.
-
packets
- Posts: 47
- Joined: Sat Jun 18, 2011 12:27 am
- Location: Holly Springs, NC
-
Contact:
Post
by packets » Sat Sep 24, 2011 2:39 am
"The HHS has proposed the federal government pursue one of three paths to obtain this sensitive information: A 'centralized approach' wherein insurers’ data go directly to Washington; an 'intermediate state-level approach' in which insurers give the information to the 50 states; or a 'distributed approach' in which health insurance companies crunch the numbers according to federal bureaucrat edict."
http://preview.tinyurl.com/3hgrm5y
