Windows Server 2012 or 7 Pro
Windows Server 2012 or 7 Pro
Need some advice on which os to select. We are opening a new office and need to order a server. Current office has a Windows Server 2011 and have multiple issues with the network frequently requiring the services of an IT person.
In light of this we are leaning towards utilizing windows 7 pro on the server. We expect to have approx 10-12 workstations and are going to use XDR for imaging.
Any suggestions or advice?
Thanks
In light of this we are leaning towards utilizing windows 7 pro on the server. We expect to have approx 10-12 workstations and are going to use XDR for imaging.
Any suggestions or advice?
Thanks
Re: Windows Server 2012 or 7 Pro
Most dental offices don't need windows server. Save your money and go with consumer windows. I suggest windows 8.1 Pro. Better yet, look into a "virtual server" by searching for posts on here.
Philip H. Doan, DDS
http://www.kaweahdental.com/
http://www.kaweahdental.com/
Re: Windows Server 2012 or 7 Pro
All versions of windows 7 have a maximum of 20 simultaneous connections for a windows file share (basically your OpenDentImages folder). Windows Server 2012 does not have a limit... So if you plan on growing at all, I'd recommend server.
The best thing about a boolean is even if you are wrong, you are only off by a bit.
Jason Salmon
Open Dental Software
http://www.opendental.com
Jason Salmon
Open Dental Software
http://www.opendental.com
- Justin Shafer
- Posts: 596
- Joined: Sat Jul 28, 2007 7:34 pm
- Location: Fort Worth, TX.
Re: Windows Server 2012 or 7 Pro
You will save money on hardware... but I think the hardware in high dollar servers in the 3k range.. have more reliable hardware.. that statement failed on a dell t300.. butI got it swapped out for a t310 and all was well... kind of like buying a nice car.. usually you get your moneys worth..... most of the time. Got clients with a workstation upgraded to raid 1 and iI have clients on dell servers... money is an issue.. well rich has those clients now.. most of em. =)
Justin Shafer
Onsite Dental Systems
817-909-4222
justin@onsitedentalsystems.com
http://www.onsitedentalsystems.com
http://iocsnapshot.com
http://justinshafer.blogspot.com
Onsite Dental Systems
817-909-4222
justin@onsitedentalsystems.com
http://www.onsitedentalsystems.com
http://iocsnapshot.com
http://justinshafer.blogspot.com
Re: Windows Server 2012 or 7 Pro
My server is windows homeserver 2011 and I don't have any issues. I tried 2012 and had all kinds of issues. It tries to force you to setup a domain that you probably don't want or need. If you google around you can find instructions on how to go back to workgroups. Mainly, SMB3 hates on ISAM databases and I had three running at the time. Now I just have one.
AFAIK, non server versions of windows (like Win 7 pro) only allow 10 users. I tried it and since we have 11 computers hitting the server, we had all kinds of issues with users connecting to shares. Strangely, I thought that WHS2011 was limited to 10 shares as well but we haven't had any issues with 11 computers running OD.
Jim Margarit
AFAIK, non server versions of windows (like Win 7 pro) only allow 10 users. I tried it and since we have 11 computers hitting the server, we had all kinds of issues with users connecting to shares. Strangely, I thought that WHS2011 was limited to 10 shares as well but we haven't had any issues with 11 computers running OD.
Jim Margarit
Re: Windows Server 2012 or 7 Pro
we use SBS 2011 Essentials... does everything I need. I was just using a Win7 pro and things were fine, but I wanted things on a domain. SBS 2011 Essentials was the cheapest way in, and has been solid in reliability..
Re: Windows Server 2012 or 7 Pro
Hi Irfan,
Could you share what are the advantages of a domain? I too am using Windows 7 pro only and things are working well with 6 stations
Could you share what are the advantages of a domain? I too am using Windows 7 pro only and things are working well with 6 stations
Re: Windows Server 2012 or 7 Pro
If it works stick with it 
I wanted centralized management of security and preferences, without having to repeat steps for every workstation. Makes things more complicated with a domain actually, so I wouldn't recommend it unless you really need it (you don't).

I wanted centralized management of security and preferences, without having to repeat steps for every workstation. Makes things more complicated with a domain actually, so I wouldn't recommend it unless you really need it (you don't).